The Hidden Costs of 99% Accuracy: A Trustworthiness Audit of the Telco Customer Churn Benchmark

Computer Science > Machine Learning

[Submitted on 9 Sep 2026]

Title:The Hidden Costs of 99% Accuracy: A Trustworthiness Audit of the Telco Customer Churn Benchmark

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Customer churn prediction on the IBM Telco Customer Churn benchmark (n = 7,043) routinely reports test accuracies above 95%, with the most cited published study reporting 99.01%. We audit this benchmark for four trustworthiness failures invisible to the accuracy- and F1-centred reporting that dominates the literature. First, pre-split SMOTE inflates churn-class F1 by 13.1 percentage points across ten classifiers and fifteen seeds (Wilcoxon p < 10^-4 per classifier); the same leaky pipeline ordering paired with class weighting yields no inflation, isolating the effect to SMOTE's geometric construction. We measure the mechanism directly: approximately 36% of synthetic training points are nearest-neighbour interpolations of test-set instances. Second, the TotalCharges field is approximately determined by tenure multiplied by MonthlyCharges (R2 = 0.999); removing it changes accuracy by less than 0.2 percentage points, yet TreeSHAP ranks it ninth in mean absolute attribution - a pattern that materially corrupts SHAP-based interpretation. We propose an R2 > 0.95 pre-modelling diagnostic. Third, in a 15-seed calibration audit, isotonic regression is the strongest default; temperature scaling fails on class-weighted tree ensembles whose predicted-probability distribution is bimodal. Fourth, the cost-optimal decision threshold (under a 50 USD retention offer and 24-month CLV proxy) is approximately 5-10 times lower than the F1-optimal threshold, saving approximately 77,000 USD per 1,000 customers. We replicate F1 and F2 on Iranian Telecom Churn (within domain) and Bank Customer Churn (across domain): F1 generalises; F2 generalises only within telecom. We synthesise these findings into a four-component reporting checklist - pipeline disclosure, redundancy diagnostic, calibration audit, and cost-sensitive thresholds - and release a reproducible implementation.

References & Citations

Loading...

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv Recommender

(What is IArxiv?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.