资讯

Verification Learning Theory: A Process Model of Checking and Retention in AI-Assisted Judgment

📅 2026-10-31 ⏱️ 约 7 分钟阅读 ✍️ AI导航编辑部 🔗 arxiv.org
Verification Learning Theory: A Process Model of Checking and Retention in AI-Assisted Judgment
📝 内容摘要

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 27 Oct 2026] Title:Verification Learning Theory: A Proces

📌 核心要点

  • [Submitted on 27 Oct 2026]
  • From: Christoph Trattner [view email][v1] Tue, 27 Oct 2026 19:18:18 UTC (2,057 KB)
  • - expected_output_vlt_s1_summaries.txt

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

[Submitted on 27 Oct 2026]

Title:Verification Learning Theory: A Process Model of Checking and Retention in AI-Assisted Judgment

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Accurate AI assistance can improve immediate judgments while reducing opportunities to practise the operations needed for independent performance. Verification Learning Theory (VLT) formalises this possibility for claim-evaluation practice followed by correct, independent, rule-specific feedback. The model links perceived assistant reliability to evidence checking and links the history of those checks to retained rule use. Its strict form assumes that task demands and perceived reliability influence learning only through checking, with equal learning per genuine check. It therefore predicts that perceived fallibility can improve delayed unaided judgment even without observed assistant errors, and that this advantage disappears when checking is already required and performed. Rule-specific gains and forecasts from checking histories provide further tests. Simulations examine the consequences and parameter dependence of these commitments; they do not constitute empirical validation. Comparisons with depth-of-processing and feedback-encoding accounts identify where predictions diverge and where the accounts remain observationally equivalent. The framework specifies experiments that can test the proposed mechanism and separates retention of practised rules from the broader problem of recognising which rule applies to a new claim.

Submission history

From: Christoph Trattner [view email][v1] Tue, 27 Oct 2026 19:18:18 UTC (2,057 KB)

Ancillary-file links:

Ancillary files (details):

- README.md

- alternatives_results.json

- expected_output_vlt_alternatives.txt

- expected_output_vlt_model_sim.txt

- expected_output_vlt_s1_summaries.txt

Additional Features

References & Citations

Loading...

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

来源arxiv.org· 本文为编辑整理,仅供参考