资讯

The First Few Tokens Matter: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Controllability

📅 2026-11-02 ⏱️ 约 7 分钟阅读 ✍️ AI导航编辑部 🔗 arxiv.org
The First Few Tokens Matter: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Controllability
📝 内容摘要

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 29 Oct 2026] Title:The First Few Tokens Matter: Understan

📌 核心要点

  • Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
  • [Submitted on 29 Oct 2026]
  • From: Hugh Van Deventer V [view email][v1] Thu, 29 Oct 2026 20:14:19 UTC (4,341 KB)

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

[Submitted on 29 Oct 2026]

Title:The First Few Tokens Matter: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Controllability

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is a promising way to oversee increasingly capable agents. It succeeds in part because current models appear limited in their ability to control what they verbalize in their reasoning traces. We investigate the source of this limitation and link it to an entropy collapse in the first few tokens following the opening thinking tag. We exploit this mechanism to recover CoT controllability through two inference-time interventions on initial tokens: prefilling, where even a single token can substantially increase controllability, and banning frequent opening tokens combined with in-context examples, which improves average compliance by 34-41 percentage points across models. These interventions recover mainly addition and style controllability (adding or transforming information), while suppression controllability (avoiding or removing information) exhibits more varied responses, suggesting distinct underlying mechanisms. Consistent with this, the two groups behave as separate capabilities: across models, performance correlates positively within these groups, while cross-group correlations are mostly negative. Importantly, we find that the relationship with monitorability depends on the evaluation: addition and style controllability more consistently positively correlate with monitorability, while suppression often shows negative associations. Our findings motivate the development of controllability evaluations that distinguish difficulty initiating a specific opening from general limitations of the ability to alter reasoning content, alongside separate reporting of control tasks and categories.

Submission history

From: Hugh Van Deventer V [view email][v1] Thu, 29 Oct 2026 20:14:19 UTC (4,341 KB)

Additional Features

References & Citations

Loading...

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

来源arxiv.org· 本文为编辑整理,仅供参考