资讯资讯

Summarize, Judge, Refine: Decoupled Content Understanding and Policy Learning for Multimodal Content ModerationSummarize, Judge, Refine: Decoupled Content Understanding and Policy Learning for Multimodal Content Moderation

📅 2026-09-22 ⏱️ 约 6 分钟阅读⏱️ 6 min read ✍️ AI导航编辑部✍️ AI Nav Editorial 🔗 arxiv.org
Summarize, Judge, Refine: Decoupled Content Understanding and Policy Learning for Multimodal Content Moderation
📝 内容摘要📝 Summary

Computer Science > Computation and Language [Submitted on 6 Aug 2026] Title:Summarize, Judge, Refine: Decoupled CoComputer Science > Computation and Language [Submitted on 6 Aug 2026] Title:Summarize, Judge, Refine: Decoupled Co

📌 核心要点

  • Computer Science > Computation and LanguageComputer Science > Computation and Language
  • [Submitted on 6 Aug 2026][Submitted on 6 Aug 2026]
  • Bibliographic and Citation ToolsBibliographic and Citation Tools

Computer Science > Computation and Language

[Submitted on 6 Aug 2026]

Title:Summarize, Judge, Refine: Decoupled Content Understanding and Policy Learning for Multimodal Content Moderation

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Content moderation systems traditionally entangle multimodal understanding with policy-specific classification, requiring full pipeline retraining for every policy change and suffering from label scarcity since multimedia cannot be meaningfully augmented. We propose Summarize-Judge-Refine (SJR), a two-model architecture that decouples these concerns via a natural language interface: a multimodal Content Model produces structured text summaries, and a text-only Policy Model classifies them against policy definitions. An iterative co-training loop refines the Content Model via GRPO to produce policy-relevant summaries, while text-space augmentation generates adversarial summary variants---an augmentation pathway impossible on raw multimedia---enabling few-shot policy bootstrap. Every decision is grounded in a human-readable summary, providing interpretability as a structural byproduct. On misleading advertisement detection, SJR achieves +23.6\% relative non-misleading F1 over a zero-shot chain-of-thought baseline, outperforming end-to-end SFT, STaR/RFT, and RLFT. Notably, a variant trained on zero real violating examples---with all positive-class data synthetically generated---matches the full-data model within 0.2\% relative on violating F1, demonstrating that new policies can launch without any real violation data.

References & Citations

Loading...

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

[Submitted on 6 Aug 2026]

Title:Summarize, Judge, Refine: Decoupled Content Understanding and Policy Learning for Multimodal Content Moderation

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Content moderation systems traditionally entangle multimodal understanding with policy-specific classification, requiring full pipeline retraining for every policy change and suffering from label scarcity since multimedia cannot be meaningfully augmented. We propose Summarize-Judge-Refine (SJR), a two-model architecture that decouples these concerns via a natural language interface: a multimodal Content Model produces structured text summaries, and a text-only Policy Model classifies them against policy definitions. An iterative co-training loop refines the Content Model via GRPO to produce policy-relevant summaries, while text-space augmentation generates adversarial summary variants---an augmentation pathway impossible on raw multimedia---enabling few-shot policy bootstrap. Every decision is grounded in a human-readable summary, providing interpretability as a structural byproduct. On misleading advertisement detection, SJR achieves +23.6\% relative non-misleading F1 over a zero-shot chain-of-thought baseline, outperforming end-to-end SFT, STaR/RFT, and RLFT. Notably, a variant trained on zero real violating examples---with all positive-class data synthetically generated---matches the full-data model within 0.2\% relative on violating F1, demonstrating that new policies can launch without any real violation data.

References & Citations

Loading...

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

来源arxiv.org· 本文为编辑整理,仅供参考