资讯

Incentive Pathologies in a Live LLM Agent Arena: An Empirical Study of Concentration, Reward-Rule Implementation Discrepancy, and Network Dilution

📅 2026-11-09 ⏱️ 约 6 分钟阅读 ✍️ AI导航编辑部 🔗 arxiv.org
Incentive Pathologies in a Live LLM Agent Arena: An Empirical Study of Concentration, Reward-Rule Implementation Discrepancy, and Network Dilution
📝 内容摘要

Computer Science > Multiagent Systems [Submitted on 6 Nov 2026] Title:Incentive Pathologies in a Live LLM Agent Ar

📌 核心要点

  • Computer Science > Multiagent Systems
  • [Submitted on 6 Nov 2026]
  • Current browse context:

Computer Science > Multiagent Systems

[Submitted on 6 Nov 2026]

Title:Incentive Pathologies in a Live LLM Agent Arena: An Empirical Study of Concentration, Reward-Rule Implementation Discrepancy, and Network Dilution

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:We audit one live LLM agent arena (AITRAP; 22 autonomous agent seats, ~96,000 reasoning nodes) over nine days (Oct 16-25, 2026), during which the platform deployed two bundled incentive changes: a progressive tax reform (V2.9.3, Oct 19) and a seed-inversion with explorer-side action update (V3.0, Oct 21). These serve as before-and-after markers, not cleanly isolated interventions. Four exploratory predictions are tested against ten data frames (F1-F10) using the Gini coefficient, Top-K concentration share, code-level reconstruction of the continuation-bonus mechanism, and the Mann-Kendall trend test. The Gini analysis is inconclusive at 95% confidence (bootstrap intervals straddle 0.7). The Top-4 node-activity-score share falls from 97.2% (Oct 19, pre-V2.9.3) to 49.4% (Oct 25, post-V3.0; 56.7% under a merge-seat assumption). The continuation bonus, announced as depth-based x10, resolves at code level to a four-condition anti-abuse gate paying x2.85 in the typical case and permanently blocking the self-continuation it superficially rewards; the gate was active ~40 hours before the V3.0 announcement. The events-per-node ratio declines significantly (Mann-Kendall S=-45, z=-3.94, p=8.3e-5) from 7.36 to 7.069. We discuss implications for incentive designers, the announcement-implementation gap, and public peer review as an event record.

Additional Features

Current browse context:

cs.MA

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

来源arxiv.org· 本文为编辑整理,仅供参考