资讯资讯

Privacy Personalization Trade offs in LLMs: The Impact of Stylometric Signal Reduction on User-Specific Text GenerationPrivacy Personalization Trade offs in LLMs: The Impact of Stylometric Signal Reduction on User-Specific Text Generation

📅 2026-09-22 ⏱️ 约 7 分钟阅读⏱️ 7 min read ✍️ AI导航编辑部✍️ AI Nav Editorial 🔗 arxiv.org
Privacy Personalization Trade offs in LLMs: The Impact of Stylometric Signal Reduction on User-Specific Text Generation
📝 内容摘要📝 Summary

Computer Science > Computation and Language [Submitted on 18 Aug 2026] Title:Privacy Personalization Trade offs inComputer Science > Computation and Language [Submitted on 18 Aug 2026] Title:Privacy Personalization Trade offs in

📌 核心要点

  • Computer Science > Computation and LanguageComputer Science > Computation and Language
  • [Submitted on 18 Aug 2026][Submitted on 18 Aug 2026]
  • From: Muhammed Nazmul Arefin [view email][v1] Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:27:06 UTC (2,030 KB)From: Muhammed Nazmul Arefin [view email][v1] Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:27:06 UTC (2,030 KB)

Computer Science > Computation and Language

[Submitted on 18 Aug 2026]

Title:Privacy Personalization Trade offs in LLMs: The Impact of Stylometric Signal Reduction on User-Specific Text Generation

View PDFAbstract:Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to generate user-specific text with high stylistic fidelity. However, the personal data that enables such personalization frequently embeds demographic, cultural, and stylistic markers that raises concerns about stylometric re- identification. This paper investigates whether reducing identifiable stylistic signals affects personalization in text generation by LLMs. We introduce a controlled framework to isolate stylometric signals in LLM personalization using the LaMP-7 Twitter benchmark. Experiments on 250 sampled users compare two settings: paraphrasing conditioned on the original profile and paraphrasing conditioned on an anonymized converted profile in which demographic identifiers, cultural references, personal details, and informal linguistic cues have been systematically neutralized. Outputs are assessed by two independent LLM judges and a complementary human evaluation. Our pairwise evaluation shows that outputs conditioned on original profiles are nearly indistinguishable from human-authored ground truth, indicating that modern LLMs can closely reproduce an author's writing style with sufficient fidelity. In contrast, preference for model outputs with anonymized profiles drops to 13.0% on average, while semantic context preservation remains high at 94.8%. A study with human evaluators confirms the same pattern. These findings reveal a clear privacy-personalization trade-off and highlight the need for privacy-aware personalization methods that retain meaning while suppressing identifying stylistic signals.

Submission history

From: Muhammed Nazmul Arefin [view email][v1] Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:27:06 UTC (2,030 KB)

References & Citations

Loading...

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

[Submitted on 18 Aug 2026]

Title:Privacy Personalization Trade offs in LLMs: The Impact of Stylometric Signal Reduction on User-Specific Text Generation

View PDFAbstract:Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to generate user-specific text with high stylistic fidelity. However, the personal data that enables such personalization frequently embeds demographic, cultural, and stylistic markers that raises concerns about stylometric re- identification. This paper investigates whether reducing identifiable stylistic signals affects personalization in text generation by LLMs. We introduce a controlled framework to isolate stylometric signals in LLM personalization using the LaMP-7 Twitter benchmark. Experiments on 250 sampled users compare two settings: paraphrasing conditioned on the original profile and paraphrasing conditioned on an anonymized converted profile in which demographic identifiers, cultural references, personal details, and informal linguistic cues have been systematically neutralized. Outputs are assessed by two independent LLM judges and a complementary human evaluation. Our pairwise evaluation shows that outputs conditioned on original profiles are nearly indistinguishable from human-authored ground truth, indicating that modern LLMs can closely reproduce an author's writing style with sufficient fidelity. In contrast, preference for model outputs with anonymized profiles drops to 13.0% on average, while semantic context preservation remains high at 94.8%. A study with human evaluators confirms the same pattern. These findings reveal a clear privacy-personalization trade-off and highlight the need for privacy-aware personalization methods that retain meaning while suppressing identifying stylistic signals.

Submission history

From: Muhammed Nazmul Arefin [view email][v1] Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:27:06 UTC (2,030 KB)

References & Citations

Loading...

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

来源arxiv.org· 本文为编辑整理,仅供参考