资讯

Correction Training for Diffusion Models

📅 2026-10-15 ⏱️ 约 7 分钟阅读 ✍️ AI导航编辑部 🔗 arxiv.org
Correction Training for Diffusion Models
📝 内容摘要

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 9 Oct 2026 (v1), last revised 14 Oct 2026 (this version, v2)]

📌 核心要点

  • [Submitted on 9 Oct 2026 (v1), last revised 14 Oct 2026 (this version, v2)]
  • From: Donghoon Ahn [view email][v1] Fri, 9 Oct 2026 13:31:52 UTC (45,356 KB)
  • [v2] Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:12:49 UTC (38,804 KB)

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

[Submitted on 9 Oct 2026 (v1), last revised 14 Oct 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:Correction Training for Diffusion Models

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Iterative sampling in diffusion models can lead to error accumulation due to exposure bias. The denoiser is trained on real images interpolated with noise, but at inference its inputs are constructed from its own imperfect predictions from the earlier steps, something it has never seen at training time. This might be one reason diffusion models often struggle without additional help, such as CFG. We introduce a correction step for diffusion models which attempts to reduce this training-inference gap. The corrector takes the base model's prediction as input and is trained against the same ground-truth target. This makes correction an explicit learning task, with training inputs provided by the base model. During sampling, at each denoising step, we iteratively refine the denoiser's clean-sample prediction. This allows us to correct predictions at intermediate denoising steps, preventing early artifacts from persisting into the final sample. Although the corrector is trained only on predictions from the base denoiser, it can be applied repeatedly to its own outputs at inference for better results. This simple framework leads to substantial improvement in sample quality while largely preserving diversity. We evaluate our method across DiT, SiT, and JiT. Our method substantially improves upon previously reported FID scores for unguided generation and, notably, unconditional generation, where producing high-quality samples without guidance has been particularly challenging. Our method achieves performance competitive with classifier-free guidance (CFG), and combining correction with CFG further improves diversity and reduces oversaturation typical of CFG. Finally, we show that the additional inference cost of correction can be amortized by distilling the refined predictions back into the base diffusion model, retaining the quality gains without additional inference-time overhead.

Submission history

From: Donghoon Ahn [view email][v1] Fri, 9 Oct 2026 13:31:52 UTC (45,356 KB)

[v2] Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:12:49 UTC (38,804 KB)

Additional Features

References & Citations

Loading...

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

来源arxiv.org· 本文为编辑整理,仅供参考